|
|
rabb1t's pc gaming tech talk
last update: June 30 / '09
This page is where I discuss PC gaming hardware. The page is divided into sections and each section contains components that have different levels of importance in the system and different upgrade/life cycles. Along the left side you will see a brief description of the part and it's purpose in the system. To the right you will find discussion on the current options for that part, what I recommend, and future directions or options for that part. One part for each section will have a "fancy carrot" This denotes what I recommend highest in terms of manufacturer, performance, and features, that should provide an excellent gaming experience at a good price. Hopefully, by translating some of the technospeak that hardware sites use into regular speak you will be better able to choose upgrades that suit your needs and give you a happy computing experience. 
|
The Core
What I call "the core" of the computer are the parts that are the most critical in determining the power of your system. It is these four parts, the central processing unit (CPU), the graphics processing unit (GPU), also known as the graphics card, the random access memory (Ram), and the motherboard. Of all the parts in your system these have the greatest impact on your overall performance.
|
|
CPU
| The Central Processing Unit, or CPU as it is most commonly referred to, is essentially the brain of the computer. Much like a human brain all of the logical processing goes on here. |
|
If you are buying a new CPU, $100-200 seems to be a 'sweet spot' that will last you at least 2 to 3 years. Targeting the $200+ range will put you into the higher-end category and set you up nicely to pair your system with a really great GPU and will last 3, possibly even 4 years. However, I do not recommend spending over $350 on a CPU as CPUs beyond that range often are so far into bleeding edge that their advantages are lost due to lack of current support for those features. By the time those features are closer to mainstream, faster cores are often available. Or, they are simply priced so high due to being bleeding edge and having a small bit more power AMD is the way to go for a bit of flexibility in the lower price range. The Intel Core 2 Duo line currently holds the crown for power/performance per dollar as well as having cores that perform faster/better than the AMD line. This difference is further increased if you overclock, as the Intel Core 2 Duo line overclocks better/further than the AMD cores.
Intel's newest chipset, the Core i7, has launched and is something to consider if you are going with a quad core build. The gains in gaming are minimal compared to the current Core 2 dual core CPUs, but gains for non-gaming are very decent. This likely will change over time as games take advantage of the newer features. Note that the Core i7 uses a new socket and will only be compatible with other Core i7 based motherboards and are best paired with tri channel DDR3.
Lifespan: Up to 4 years. I recommend you change the CPU every 2.
Intel Dual Core Recommendations:
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 - An ok dual core that is a bit lower cost due to having a bit slower FSB speed.
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 - An ideal dual core for gaming. This is likely the absolute best in terms of price and performance.
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 - An ideal dual core for gaming.
Intel Quad Core Recommendations:
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 - A very good quad core for gamers. This is compatible with the previous socket 775 design.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - A very good quad core for gamers. This is compatible with the previous socket 775 design. However, due to price it may be better to look at a Core i7 build. I only recommend using the Q9550 if you already have a socket 775 motherboard. If you are doing a new build you'd be better served with a Core i7 920.
Intel Quad Core Core i7 Recommendations:
Intel Core i7 920 - An ideal quad core for gaming and a decent gain in non-gaming over the previous Core 2 Quad design. This would be the quad core CPU to look at for the best of builds at this point in time at the best performance to price point.
Intel Core i7 940 - An ideal quad core for gaming and a decent gain in non-gaming over the previous Core 2 Quad design. This would be the quad core CPU to look at for the best of builds at this point in time. However, due to the cost you should only consider it if you have an unlimited budget.
AMD Dual Core Recommendations, AM2+/AM2:
Athlon AM2 64 X2 5600 - AM2 - A good lower-cost dual core for the older AM2 socket. Note that only a few AM2 boards can't accept AM2+ CPUs, so only choose this one if that is the case.
Athlon AM2 64 X2 7750 - AM2+ - A lower-cost dual core. Note though it may only be a small price increase to go with a quad core.
Athlon AM2 64 X2 7850 - AM2+ - A lower-cost dual core. Basically the same as the X2 7750, but this one is better for overclockers. Note though it may only be a small price increase to go with a quad core.
AMD Quad Core Recommendations, AM2+/AM2:
Phenom 9600 - Four core CPU.
Phenom 9950 - Four core CPU.
Phenom II X4 920 - Four core CPU. A new generation of the Phenom which requires an AM2+ motherboard which supports the Phenom II.
Phenom II X4 940 - Four core CPU. A new generation of the Phenom which requires an AM2+ motherboard which supports the Phenom II.
AMD Tri and Quad Core Recommendations, AM3:
The AM3 CPUs will give higher performance when on an AM3 board, however, it should be noted that while they are supposed to be compatible with AM2+/AM2 boards some of them are not. I would recommend only pairing these CPUs with an AM3 type motherboard. Right now I only recommend one such board due to limited board selection. Soon I will change recommendations to include more AM3 motherboards and CPUs.
Phenom II X3 710 - Three core CPU.
Phenom II X4 810 - Four core CPU.
Phenom II X4 955 - Four core CPU.
A word on Quad core:  We are on the verge of multi-threaded gaming. While games only benefit from more than 2 cores right now in a few games, very soon more will start to release that truly take advantage of mult-core and those multi-core CPUs should really start to shine. Until those games release, quad core isn't a huge benefit over dual core in gaming. So, choosing a quad core or dual core will really be up to you based on your upgrade habbits. I'd guess you can safely remain on dual core up till the end of 2009 and not 'miss much'.
On the Horizon: 
- Intel will reduce the dye size on Core i7 with their Westmere core during 2010 This will likely result in cheaper CPUs with slightly faster speeds as well as reducing power consumption. This will also be the launch of >4 core CPUs. - Link
- Intel will further tweak the Core i7 with their Sandy Bridge design in 2010. I haven't yet seen how this may benefit gaming performance. - Link
- Intel In Q3'2009 Intel will launch the Core i5 (aka socket 1156, first CPUs codenamed "Lynnfield"), a lower cost 'mainstream' targeted CPU based on their new Core i7 architecture. By mainstream they mean everyone, while we gamers will always be a bit higher than the true 'mainstream' of everyone. At first I thought we gamers may want to ignore Core i5, but a recent article (linked) may reference this is not the case. It appears more like only the overclockers will want to stick with Core i7 and those of us who play at stock speeds will get a lower price and amazing performance from the Core i5. It is critical to note that the Core i5 CPUs and motherboards will be incompatible with the Core i7 CPUs and motherboards meaning if you had the fastest Core i5 and wanted to move up to the fastest Core i7 you would have to buy not only a CPU but also a motherboard. As we have seen in the past with AMD's socket 754 and 939, splitting your market is not a good idea, as it causes upgrade restrictions and confusion among those who aren't 'in the know'. This can confuse the consumer, but it looks like this early article may indicate that I will want to recommend Core i5 to pretty much everyone and only make a mention of Core i7 in the future due to the price difference. - Link
- AMD plans to move to 45nm processing in 2009.
- AMD will release 6 core CPUs (part of the Phenom 2 line) in the second half of 2009. - Link
- AMD will release 8 and 12 core CPUs in 2010. - Link
CPU Cooling
An 'aftermarket cooler' is never required, but they can be cooler and quieter than retail coolers. A good liquid system will keep your temperatures low as well as offering a lower noise volume. However, I only recommend liquid if you are going for a silent system or are going to do extreme overclocking. Most aftermarket coolers will do just fine under mild overclocking conditions and are a lot lower cost than liquid and much easier to install.
When installing the CPU cooler be careful not to touch the surface with your fingers, particularly the part which contacts the CPU, as finger greases will harm most coolers. Usually you can hold the coolers by their fin areas with little to no danger of harm. I recommend using rubber gloves if you have them.
Recommendations:
Zalman CNPS 9900 LED - A good cooler, but a bit expensive. This design improves on many of Zalmans strong features, and removes some of the older problems (high weight and using a backplate.)
CPU Cooler Compound / Paste
Arctic Silver 5
NewEgg link
Do realize that if you use an aftermarket cooler you will have to apply thermal compound (in almost all cases), whereas retail coolers often have cooling paste pre-applied. It is fairly easy to do this if you follow the directions. The manufacturer should include paste with the cooler, but Arctic Silver is better than the free stuff for low cost.
For cleaning off thermal paste you can use "isopropyl rubbing alcohol" which can be found in most regular shoping stores, like Safeway, for about $1.75. I've seen them sold in 70% and 90% bottles. I'm pretty sure either is fine. I use 70%.
|
| GPU
| The Graphics Processing Unit, or GPU as it is most commonly referred to, is what drives the graphics of the system.
The GPU consists of 2 chips - one drives 2d elements, such as video streams and web sites, and a 3d element, which runs games.
The more powerful your GPU is, the better performance you will have in video and games.
|
|
A graphics card worth about $150-300 should cover you for high-end settings on new games for ~2 years depending on the exact settings you use. Typically graphics cards in the $100-150 range will do just fine for mainstream/medium settings and resolutions for new games or slightly higher for games that don't use the most current graphical effects. At $300 and higher you are into the high end and will have a better gaming experience at higher resolutions or higher graphical settings. Note though that the majority of users won't need to spend this much, as the increase is only typically necessary for bleeding-edge games with maximum settings, or very high resolutions such as 2560x1600.
DirectX10 and 10.1 discussion has been moved to the articles & guides page. See that page for details if you have questions.
Something new for graphics cards and motherboards is PCIe x16 Version 2. When a graphics card and motherboard both have PCIe v2 the graphics card has more bandwidth. It may be some time before games need this increased bandwidth, but it is a nice feature to watch out for. It likely will be a few years before graphic cards benefit from this, so this isn't something to be overly concerned with right now. Everyone should have made the move to v2 before it's power is tapped. Note that part of the PCIe v2 standard is a new 8-pin graphics card connector. Some of these new graphic cards may use this connector type, and if they do, you would also need a PCIe v2 compatible power supply. (All the ones I list have PCIe v2 compatibility.)
I have developed a rating system that may help people choose which graphics card is best for their resolution and use. Note that this is not an absolute science, as each game varies in how much graphical power it will use, and in-game settings will require different levels of power. Note that these ratings may chang as time goes on and the cards age, are replaced by newer cards, or games require more power.
Hidden advantages: 
It is important to note that there are some hidden advantages with your choice of graphic chip manufacturer. Right now all the advantages lie with Nvidia.
Nvidia: Nvidia's main advantage is PhysX, a method of accelerating physics calculations on the graphics card in order to produce some cool effects. One of the more noteworthy effects is dynamic cloth simulation. While these effects are basically limited to 'eye candy' right now and only appear in a small number of games, adoption of the PhysX engine may become more widespread as more and more PhysX capable cards filter into the hands of consumers. (These are limited to the series 8 and on, so older cards can't do it.) There is also 3D gaming by way of Nvidia GeForce 3D Vision. Currently this is a fairly expensive technology, as the glasses cost $200 and it requires a special monitor (which are currently around $400), of which there are only two PC monitors at the time of this writing. (April '09.) In terms of manufacturer advantages there are several Nvidia manufacturers which offer lifetime coverage (and more) while only XFX offers lifetime coverage for ATi cards.
ATi: Currently ATi has no true hidden advantages. The current series does feature DirectX 10.1, while Nvidia only has DX10.0, but this advantage is extremely minor as only a tiny handful of games support this. Word is that they are working on their own physics acceleration and 3D monitor, but neither has released. In terms of manufacturer advantages there are several Nvidia manufacturers which offer lifetime coverage (and more) while only XFX offers lifetime coverage for ATi cards.
Cards which reference (OC) are overclocked, offering minor performance increases over stock speed versions.
Lifespan: About 3 years. I recommend you change your graphics card every 2 to stay completely current in features and power.
Nvidia Recommendations:
9500 GT - BFG 9500 GT / Evga 9500 GT
This should be fine for most games at lower settings.
9600 GT - BFG 9600 GT (OC) / Evga 9600 GT, Low Power edition This is really the lowest I'd recommend for (Nvidia) gamers. Note the price difference may be very small compard to the more powerful GTS 250 or an older card such as the 9800 GT. GTS 250, 512 meg - BFG GTS 250, 512 meg OCE (OC) / Evga GTS 250, 512 meg Superclocked (OC)
This is the true lowest I'd recommend for a gamer to be safe, as this allows for higher game settings and higher resolutions. Be sure to compare prices to the 1 gig version.
GTS 250, 1 gig - BFG GTS 250, 1 gig / Evga GTS 250, 1 gig Superclocked (OC)
The GTS 250 1 gig replaces the 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+. The GTX 250 is smaller and requires less power than the 9800 GTX types.
GTX 260 Core 216 - BFG GTX 260 Core 216, OC2BE (OC) / Evga GTX 260 Core 216, Superclocked (OC)
This slightly improves on the previous GTX 260 tech. Note: 10.5". Note: PCIe x2.
GTX 275 - BFG GTX 275, OCE (OC) / Evga GTX 275, Superclocked (OC) 
The GTX 275 is the ultimate choice for Nvidia. It has as much power as the GTX 285 at 1920x1200 res or lower but it offers that power at a substantially lower cost. Note: 10.5". Note: PCIe x2.
GTX 285 - BFG GTX 285, OC (OC) / Evga GTX 285 / GTX 285, Evga Superclocked (OC) / Evga GTX 285, FTW (OC)
The GTX 285 is an update to the previous GTX 280. The GTX 285 offers higher bandwidth than the GTX 275 which will be useful at extreme resolutions, such as 2560x1600. While theoretically helpful at 1920x1200, FPS speeds and settings are nearly identical to the less expensive (and newer) GTX 275. Note: 10.5". Note: PCIe x2.
GTX 295 - BFG GTX 295 / Evga GTX 295
The GTX 295 is a dual graphic chip design. It mixes technology used in the original GTX 260 and 280 to create a double chip card which outperforms dual GTX 260. Note: 10.5". Note: PCIe x2 (one a 6-pin, one an 8-pin). Note that due to the dual graphic chip design only 2 of these can be used in a system.
GTX 3xx - Rumors are that Nvidia plans to launch the 3xx series in October of 2009. I expect at launch we'll see a GTX 380 and GTX 360, though, as I've been saying, if they use the 360 numbering I'll lol. It has not been stated if this will be a DirectX11 compatible part or not. I would expect it would be.
ATi Recommendations:
HD 4670 - Asus HD 4670
This should be fine for most games at lower settings.
HD 4830 - XFX HD 4830
This is really the lowest I'd recommend for (ATi) gamers.
HD 4770 - XFX HD 4770
A good choice at a good price.
HD 4850, 512 meg - XFX HD 4850 512 meg, XXX
A very good choice at a good price.
HD 4870 - XFX HD 4870
The 4870 is a touch more powerful than the 4850, offering faster core speeds.
HD 4890 - XFX HD 4890, Xtreme
A great choice for ATi for those looking for a high-end card. Note: 10.5". Note: PCIe x2.
HD 4870 X2 - XFX HD 4870 X2
A great choice for ATi for those looking for a high-end card. Note: 10.5". Note: PCIe x2, one of the plugs must be 8-pin. Note that due to the dual graphic chip design only 2 of these can be used in a system.
HD 5xxx(?) - Rumors have surfaced (early June '09) that reference AMD is implying a DirectX11 compatible part "sooner than you think", which can only mean they are targeting a launch prior to Windows 7. If that is the case then it is entirely possible we may see a 'ATi series 5' launch in I'd guess late August or September.
Best for 1280x1024 or lower, may be ok at 1680x1050. One star cards will be an entry level or lower mainstream gaming cards. Most games will need to be set at low settings. I only recommend 1 star cards if you can't afford a 2 star, as there will be a big rift between them in power.
Best for 1680x1050 or 1280x1024. Two star cards are lower mainstream and should be fine for lower or medium settings.
Best for 1680x1050. Three star cards are a great choice. Most people will want a 3 or 4 star card. Games should run at medium or higher settings.
Best for 1680x1050, 1920x1080, 1920x1200, or 1600x1200. Four star cards are a great choice and have a touch more oomf. Most people will want a 3 or 4 star card. Games should have no problem running at higher settings.
Best for 1920x1080, 1920x1200, or 1600x1200. Five star cards are higher-end and are best for high-resolution and high settings.
Best for 1920x1080 or 1920x1200 and up. Overkill Rank 1 is a high-end card and has power or features that exceed all but the most demanding games. It is best to avoid this type of card unless you have a high spending limit.
Best for 2560x1600 and up. Overkill Rank 2 is a high-end card and has power or features that exceed all but the most demanding games, and likely will remain overkill for quite some time. It is best to avoid this type of card unless you have an unlimited budget.
Note that some cards are 10.5" and may not fit in all cases. These cards are referenced by "Note: 10.5" in the above text. Also note that some cards may require more than one PCIe plug. These are noted in the text above as "Note: PCIe x2" with an additional note if they require the new 8-pin type.
|
| Ram
| The Random Access Memory, or Ram as it is more commonly referred to, is effectively the short-term memory of the system.
In general, the more ram a system has the more it can work with at one time. If it has too little information will have to go back and forth between the ram and the hard drive.
|
|
Some motherboards can take "SLI" certified ram, which will automatically overclock the ram. The SLI certification, sometimes called "enhanced performance profile" or "EPP" is an Nvidia specific feature and you'll need a specific ('enthusiast') Nvidia chipset to be able to use it. Note that this only exists on some Nvidia 6xx and 7xx chipsets. It does not exist with the new x58 chipset.
Ram has two ratings; one is the overall speed, and one is the timings. "Tighter" timings, those which are smaller numbers, can be "faster" ram. While this may not yield a huge difference compared to regular speed ram, if you can get ram with lower timings for not too much more than regular timings you may want to go for it. If you have a choice of slower overall speed versus tight timing, tight timing will often yield a better rain.
I really don't recommend less than 4 gig. Even if your system may not be able to use all of the ram for memory (32-bit operating systems will only "see" about 3.5 or 3 gig) it is best to go ahead and get 4 gig (ideally in two 2 gig sticks.) The only time I recommend sticking with 2 gig is if the system is on a very tight budget, or you live in a part of the world where moving to 4 gig from 2 is prohibitvely expensive.
Note that it is ideal to match the ram speed to the (fastest) motherboard FSB speed. I say ideal as most times faster ram speeds will increase the cost, and the gain may be very small for such an increase.
The Core i7 chipset is capable of using tri-channel ram. (Boards may also be able to use dual channel.) This means that you ideally want to pair your Core i7 motherboard with a DDR3 ram kit that includes three ram sticks.
Intel (in conjunction with Corsair) have also introduced a new memory feature with the Core i7 called "XMP" (eXtreme Memory Profile). This is a feature that automatically sets the ram timing, voltage, and frequency to high settings that the board will recognize. You don't have to worry about tweaking settings for the ram to work properly.
However, if you are an overclocker and choose to alter these settings for even higher performance you are free to do so. Additionally, when the system boots, even if you have modified these settings they will be temporarily reset to safe settings during boot to be safe, so you don't have to worry about extreme settings messing things up and preventing a boot cycle.
Lifespan: Add or change as needed. Typically needs change with CPU / Motherboard generations. Roughly 4 years, but I recommend changing with your Motherboard change. Check the standards every other year.
Recommendations - 4 gig kits (2 x 2 gig sticks):
Corsair XMS2 - a DDR2-800 4-gig kit with decent timing. (5-5-5-18 timed)
OCZ SLI-Ready Edition - SLI/EPP certified - a DDR2-800 4-gig kit with good timing. (5-4-4-15 timed)
OCZ Reaper - SLI/EPP certified - a DDR2-1066 4-gig kit with great timing. (5-5-5-18 timed). Note though this takes pretty high voltage. Also note it is slightly slower timing than the DDR2-800 speed ram, so I'm not sure how much of a gain this will be for gaming, as it is slightly faster overall, but slightly slower timings. It may not be worth the price increase.
Recommendations - Core i7 6 gig kits (3 x 2 gig sticks) DDR3:
Corsair XMS3 - a DDR3-1600 6-gig kit. (DDR3-1600 8-8-8-24) A solid ram kit that doesn't use XMP. Note that Corsair can sometimes be a bit more expensive, but they are a solid brand.
OCZ Core i7 version - a DDR3-1333 6-gig kit with XMP for the best settings. (7-7-7-20 or 8-8-8-20 timed.)
OCZ Core i7 version - a DDR3-1600 6-gig kit with XMP for the best settings. (DDR3-1800 8-8-8-24 or 9-9-9-28.)
OCZ Reaper HPC version - a DDR3-1800 6-gig kit with fancy heat fins. (8-8-8-26 timed) I always wonder if these fancy heat fins impair installation.
Projections: 
When considering upgrade paths, be aware that some motherboard designs will use DDR3. Some DDR3 capable boards for Intel are out now; the Nvidia 790i chipset boards and the Core i7 boards. I would only recommend a DDR3 based build now if you are considering a quad core. If you need to watch your costs, you'd see a far greater gain by spending the money on a better graphics card and/or a less costly CPU. The real gains for quad core at this time lie in non-gaming applications. Your best bet right now for a DDR3 build is the Core i7 as gains in memory use and non-gaming applications are very decent compared to the previous generation DDR3 capable boards (like the Nvidia 790i chipset boards.)
|
| Motherboard
| The Motherboard, sometimes abbreviated as MB, is effectively the nervous system in the computer. It controls the flow of information between various locations. |
|
This motherboard is silent, and has no chip fan; meaning there is 1 less part that can fail and 1 less part that generates noise. This is a good board with tons of features. Be warned that a doublewide GPU may block Sata slots 5 and 6. Most people won't use more than a few slots, however, for you raid heavy people that will be something to watch out for.
Watch out for motherboards with chipset fans. These tiny fans are great for cooling, but they often are noisy and are prone to failure. A silent heat pipe system is often a better choice.
Something new to watch for is compatibility with the new PCI Express 16 Version 2 standard (PCIe v2). This new slotting type will allow graphic cards to run even faster than they currently do. Note that v1 or v2 graphic cards can be used with either a v1 or v2 motherboard, but in order to run at the v2 speed it must be paired with a v2 compatible motherboard. It likely will be a few years before graphic cards benefit from this, so this isn't something to be overly concerned with right now. Everyone should have made the move to v2 before it's power is tapped.
The Core i7 motherboards have launched and introduce some new features. The greatest feature which will benefit gamers is the ability to run either Nvidia's SLI or ATi's Crossfire. This means you no longer have to worry about which graphic card you choose for your board, you just have to be sure to get a matching one of it's type when you want to go dual or tri graphics. The boards also feature tri channel ram, meaning they would best be paired with a new tri ram kit. They could also use an older dual kit, but from what I've seen of early offerings the tri ram kits aren't all that much more expensive than the dual kit, so they would be the better choice when purchasing for a new build.
Lifespan: Motherboard changes are dictated by CPU socket changes. The tech rarely changes during a CPU lifecycle.
Intel Recommendations, socket 775:
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR - An Intel P45 northbridge chipset board. This would be good for those on a budget. Note that this board only has a single PCI express x16 slot so running dual GPUs is not possible on this board.
Evga 730i - 113-YW-E115-TR - The Nvidia 730i chipset offers an on-motherboard GPU. While this would be fine for web browsing and such you really don't want to use it for gaming. However, it can be run in SLI with an add-in graphics card, so that is a nice boost for someone on a tight budget. This board would be a great choice for gamers on a very tight budget due to the SLI boost.
Evga 750i SLI - 123-YW-E175-A1 - The Nvidia 750i chipset offers dual-SLI support, unlike the higher 780i chipset types which offer tri. This board would be a great choice for most gamers.
Evga 780i FTW SLI - 132-YW-E178-A1 - The Nvidia 780i SLI board offers tri-SLI support, which would allow you to use three Nvidia graphic cards together. This board can also use SLI/EPP certified ram. This is a modified version of the 780i with a few extra features.
Intel Recommendations, Core i7:
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R - An Core i7 board for teh cheap. Note that while this board is less expensive than the other X58 chipset boards, it also is limited by only having 2 graphic card slots. (The others have 3-4.)
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P - A standard Core i7 X58 chipset board by Gigabyte.
Evga X58 SLI - 141-BL-E757-TR - A solid board with solid features at a good price.
Evga X58 SLI - 141-BL-E760-A1 - A board with tweaked features for the extreme overclocker. This is one of those boards for people with far too much money to spend who view overclocking as an additional hobby layer on top of system building. For those who don't overclock there really isn't much this board will offer that the much less expensive 132-BL-E758-A1 has to offer.
AMD Recommendations:
Evga 113-M2-E113 - an Nvidia Nvidia 8200 Northbridge. Single GPU only.
Asus M3N72-D - an Nvidia 750a SLI Northbridge. The best comprimise between enthusiast cost level and features. This is the best choice for most consumers. This is one of the new Nvidia chipsets which allows 'HybridPower' which will shut down your Nvidia add in graphics card when it isn't needed, lowering your power use and noise volume. This is also compatible with the new AM2+ CPU types and can use PCIe v2 graphic cards.
Asus M3N-HT Deluxe - an enthusiast Nvidia 780a SLI Northbridge. This is the best choice for advanced features. This is one of the new Nvidia chipsets which allows 'HybridPower' which will shut down your Nvidia add in graphics card when it isn't needed, lowering your power use and noise volume. This is also compatible with the new AM2+ CPU types and can use PCIe v2 graphic cards.
Asus M4A78-E - an enthusiast AMD 790GX Northbridge. This is a new AM2+/AM3 type motherboard.
|
Sub-core Systems The sub-core is what I'd consider the parts of the computer that are required for operation, but are parts that have a far less significant impact on the system's overall performance.
|
Sound Card

| An add on sound card helps out the CPU by accelerating sound independent of other CPU processes. Additionally some sound cards can greatly increase the quality of the sounds. |
|
For me, good positional audio really increases my enjoyment of a game. Some of the Creative Labs X-Fi cards include on-board ram, a first for sound cards. Only a few games take advantage of the on-board ram so this isn't as big of a gain as it may sound like. Some games feature EAX 5.0 coding and when you play one of those games the sounds do sound far superior to games without EAX 5.0. On-motherboard audio currently only use EAX 2.0 (unless it is an X-Fi chip), so while sound from on-motherboard chips will be adequate, they won't be quite as nice. The majority of users will not really notice a difference between a game that is coded for the X-Fi and a system that has one and a system which is simply using on-board motherboard sound. This goes double for users who are using headphones instead of speakers. I would recommend that most people consider spending more money on graphics before considering adding in an add in sound card since benefits from better graphics is more apparent to more users.
Asus has launched a new sound card, the "Xonar DX". This could be the first real competition for Creative Labs in many years. The Xonar DX is limited to EAX 2.0, but fakes EAX 5.0 through emulation, meaning its sound quality and clarity would be very close to the Creative Labs X-Fi line.
Note that some cards use the old-school PCI connection, while some cards use the new-school PCI express 1x connection. A PCIe 1x type card can theoretically be used in any PCIe slot, so those 16x and 8x graphic card slots should work just fine for a PCIe 1x sound card if you don't have an available 1x slot.
Lifespan: Sound card tech rarely changes. I recommend updating every 3 years, or as needed due to a tech change.
Recommendations; PCI express 1x connection:
Asus Xonar DX - Should be good for gamers. Note that it is limited to EAX 2.0 (compared to the 5.0 on the X-Fi) so sound clarity and positional effects in some games won't be as good as an X-Fi card.
Asus Xonar Essence STX - Should be good for gamers. Note that it is limited to EAX 2.0 (compared to the 5.0 on the X-Fi) so sound clarity and positional effects in some games won't be as good as an X-Fi card. This card features advanced sound cleaning techniques, so there will be less distortion from the system as a whole. Note though that distortion of sound is rarely an issue with any add-in card, so this seems to have an awfuly high price tag for what you are getting.
Creative Labs Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium - This is the 'mainstream card' for the X-Fi line. This card features DTS and THX certification, in addition to having an optical port. If you can catch this on sale it is a great buy. If not you may as well get the Fatal1ty Professional version for the shield and X-Ram for just a little more.
Creative Labs Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Professional - This has a few features that the XtremeGamer does not. (Unless you can catch the Titanium on sale you may as well just get this version.) Most notible is the X-Ram, which was designed to boost performance when games pre-load sounds onto the card. It also has a shield to protect the card from interfearance.
Note that you will want to avoid the "Xtreme Audio" version of the X-Fi line as this is really an Audigy SE. Both the Audigy SE line and the "X-Fi Xtreme Audio" version are missing features that are used in today's games. The "Xtreme Audio" is not a true X-Fi card.
Speakers
I tend to stick with one speaker set and change when the sound technology changes. These were decent sounding mid-cost speakers when I got them. Technology hasn't changed much, so there hasn't been any real reason for me to upgrade even though I made this purchase in 2005.
Lifespan: A personal choice, but I recommend every 3-5 years or as needed.
Recommendations:
Logitech X-540 5.1 speaker set - A very good entry level speaker set choice.
Logitech G51 5.1 speaker set - A very good speaker set which should be more than adequate for most users.
Logitech Z-5500 5.1 digital speaker set (NewEgg Link) / (Amazon link) / (ProVantage Link) - A high end speaker set for the true sound enthusiast. I believe this is the only PC speaker set that uses a digital connection.
Belkin PureAV AV20000 - If your sound card and speaker set can use a digital connection, this would be a good choice for a cable. At 6' this should be plenty long enough to go from your PC to your speaker set.
Headsets/Headphones
I prefer speakers to headsets, but some people may not have that option or may prefer to use headsets so they don't bother their roommates. It seems there are about three classes of headsets - the tiny in the ear type, the type you put over (or hang on) your ears, and the type which are larger and have foam pads and go around your ears. The tiny in the ear type are likely not very good for gaming due to their lower sound quality. (They also tend to have shorter cords.) Also, these can bother the wearer over extended periods of use. The over the ear type can be ok for sound reproduction, but they aren't ideal for extended use as they often bother the user due to either smashing or hanging on the ear. The over the ear type is ideal for extended use and gaming.
There is some debate if surround sound actually works with headsets. While headsets can include multiple speakers on each side, this will obviously come at a sacrifice of speaker quality due to the multiple smaller speaker size compared to two larger ones. In most cases would recommend going with a basic two speaker design which is over the ear and pass on trying to get surround sound unless you are willing to pay the extra costs to do so.
Most headphones have two plugs, one for sound and one for the microphone, though some will have a USB connection which acts as both plugs.
I noticed a reference that USB headsets can play sound independant of your speakers if you are using a voice chat program. Thus, you could have your game sound set to the speakers which connect to your sound card and set your voice chat program to independantly run voice sounds to the USB headset. I can't verify this, but it sounds logical.
Recommendation:
Creative Fatal1ty Gaming Headset - 3.5mm connection type, 2.1 sound - An over the ear design which has a removable microphone. It also includes a nice carrying case for the headset (and microphone).
Creative Fatal1ty Gaming Headset - USB connection type, 2.1 sound - Same as above, but this one is USB.
Logitech G35 - USB connection type, 7.1 sound - An over the ear design which has 7.1 sound, changeable headband foam, and voice modulation keys for extra lolz. The microphone can be rotated up to be out of the way and automatically mutes while in this position.
|
Hard drive

| The hard drive stores all of the information in the computer. You can think of this like your long-term memory. When your PC operates it moves information from the hard drive's long term storage to the system ram. |
|
I had to change my hard drive around September '06 and decided to go with the Western Digital SE16. I absolutely love this drive, as it has a ton of space, it is extremely quiet, and runs very quickly. This drive will do just fine under gaming operation. A Raptor (a 10,000 RPM high speed type) will be faster than normal drives, but this difference will only appear during times the drive is operating. For gaming this means slightly faster load times. Typically gaming load times are not a situation where you really need to worry about speed. However, with a heavy media application, such as compiling code, manipulating data, etc., these savings can add up.
Note that all drives are "OEM" items and do not have a box or cables. However, your motherboard kit should include the necessary Sata cables.
Lifespan: Hard drive tech changes rarely, but I recommend changing your hard drive about every 3 to 4 years.
Recommendations; standard speed:
Western Digital Caviar SE16 320 gig - A solid performing HD. This uses slightly newer tech than the 250 so it might have a tiny bit better performance.
Western Digital Caviar Black 500 gig - Higher/enhanced cache for better/quicker access.
Western Digital Caviar Black 640 gig - Higher/enhanced cache for better/quicker access.
Western Digital Caviar Black 750 gig - Higher/enhanced cache for better/quicker access and very high storage space.
Western Digital Caviar Black 1 terra - Higher/enhanced cache for better/quicker access and very high storage space.
Recommendations; high speed:
Western Digital VelociRaptor 300 gig - This drive can be a fair bit quicker in load and save times, however, this gain is not always assured and the drive more expensive compared to regular speed drives. A fast hard drive should be one of the last upgrade choices in your system. The VelociRaptor drive is faster and has more drive space than previous Raptor line.
Recommendations; solid state:
OCZ Vertex 120 gig - This drive is of decent size and one of the fastest solid states currently available. Note that since solid state is bleeding edge it has a very extreme price for its capacity and gains (for the price) over a VelociRaptor will be fairly small. The Vertex series improves on the Apex, but those improvements can't be seen in the stats.
OCZ Vertex 250 gig - This drive is one of the largest and fastest solid states currently available. Note that since solid state is bleeding edge it has a very extreme price for its capacity and gains (for the price) over a VelociRaptor will be fairly small. The Vertex series improves on the Apex, but those improvements can't be seen in the stats.
Projections: 
Solid state drives are still bleeding edge and likely will remain out of mainstream for quite some time. Note that because they are still bleeding edge they are still far more costly than something like a VelociRaptor while only providing a small amount of gain. While the OCZ Vertex is one of the best, a new drive named "Agility" should be out soon that will use slightly slower speed ram, but may be much more affordable.
|
| DVD / CD

|
DVD burners are getting lower in price these days, so there isn't any reason not to get one (compared to getting a CD type). Just be sure it has features and speeds you are happy with. Try and check for a sata connection type and Windows Vista certification.
Lifespan: Media tech changes rarely. I recommend changing as necessary.
Recommendations:
Samsung DVD/CD burner with LightScribe - SH-S223Q - A good drive that should cover all of your DVD and CD burning and reading needs.
LiteOn Blu-ray player and DVD/CD burner - iHES106-29 - A drive which can read Blu-ray as well as burning DVD/CDs. Note that speeds are a touch slower for DVD/CD operation, so installations and burns may take a touch longer compared to the standard DVD/CD drives above. If that is your primary function stick to a standard drive. Also note that Blu-ray recordable media is very expensive compared to DVD. The free software which is included may not have very many Blu-ray playback options. Additional software may be required to get the full uncompressed 5.1 audio.
|
Power Supply

| The power supply unit, or PSU, is basically the heart of your system. It controls where the power goes and how much is sent. |
|
Something new to watch for is compatibility with the new PCI Express 16 Version 2 standard (PCIe v2). This requires an 8-pin power connector for graphic cards. Previously power supplies used a 6-pin type, most on the market only have 6-pin. However, many new power supplies use a "6+2" pin method. My recommendations all have at least one 6+2-pin PCIe connector, with two or more total PCIe connectors.
Lifespan: About 4 years. I recommend changing every 3 years or as needed.
Recommendations:
There are three things to consider when purchasing a power supply; the overall Power ratting, the 12 volt rails / total amps, and the Fan size / speed.
Power rating is the overall big number you see listed on the box. Today, right now, you want to target 500w or higher with a new system for single graphic card use, or 650w or higher for dual graphic card use.
The 12v lines and total amps is equally important and equally as tricky to gauge your needs. These are very important for graphics card power, but also important if you run lots of devices (such as multiple hard drives.) The short version is that you want at least 34 total amps these days. If a power supply has multiple 12v lines you can add their amounts together to find the total amps.
Fans are important to consider if you are concerned about noise. Larger fan size doesn't automatically mean that the fan will be quieter, but it does mean that it can run at a lower speed. You will want to be sure that the fan has a speed control, which is critical for keeping noise at a minimum. Some fans run at only one speed, meaning they produce more noise than they have to and will likely be overly loud.
Efficiency is also something you may wish to check. Most power supplies these days will have >80% efficiency. Less efficient units will produce more heat and may cost you more in terms of a monthly power bill. (Though this monthly cost increase likely won't be too noticeable.)
PCIe connectors are also something you may want to consider. The power supplies I recommend all have at least two PCIe connections that use the new 6+2 pin connectors. Some graphic cards only require one PCIe plug, however, some require two. Depending on how many of which cards you will use you may want one, two, four, or six PCIe connectors total.
While it is tempting to buy a cheap power supply, don't. The power supply is the heart of your system, so you want a good one. Read some reviews and go with a well-known brand that matches your price and performance needs if you are unsure.
Recommendations: All power supplies listed are PCIe v2 compatible and have two or more 8-pin ("6+2") PCIe connection types.
Corsair CMPSU-520HX, 520w - 2 PCIe - Modular, adjusts fan speed. (Note NewEgg's site is incorrect in listing it as a 6-pin PCIe connector.) Best with single graphic card systems.
Corsair CMPSU-620HX, 620w - 2 PCIe - Modular, adjusts fan speed. (Note NewEgg's site is incorrect in listing it as a 6-pin PCIe connector.) Good for systems with single or dual graphic cards.
Corsair CMPSU-650TX, 650w - 2 PCIe - Adjusts fan speed. Good for systems with single or dual graphic cards. Note that with only 2 PCIe lines you won't be able to run dual card which require more than one plug each.
Corsair CMPSU-850TX, 850w - 4 PCIe - Adjusts fan speed. A great choice for systems with dual graphic cards.
Corsair CMPSU-850HX, 850w (NewEgg Link) / (Amazon Link) - 6 PCIe - Modular, adjusts fan speed. A great choice for systems with dual graphic cards, and it may be able to handle tri or quad graphic cards. This is likely the best choice if budget isn't a concern and you are going with dual graphic cards. This does support a new ATX 12v 2.3 standard, but I'm not sure how important that is.
Corsair CMPSU-1000HX, 1000w (NewEgg Link) / (Amazon Link) - 6 PCIe - Modular, adjusts fan speed. This is likely the ideal choice for a multiple graphic card system, as it has 4 lines dedicated to the graphic card connections, which is more than any other power supply I've listed.
|
|
Case
|
I have to say that the Antec Nine Hundred is an amazingly quiet case and it isn’t overly large like some. I accidentally had one fan bumped to high when I first booted up, boy was that loud, but that's actually a good feature - the fans can be switched between three different settings depending on your cooling needs. The extra room in the case makes it easy to set things up. The fan settings are a great option, allowing you to go for silence or for maximum cooling. There are even thingies in the tray of the case so you can twist tie cables here and there to make cable management easy. The Antec Nine Hundred is easily one of the best cases I have owned. (So far I’ve owned at least 6.)
In my opinion cases that cost more than $100 are too expensive. Usually the features you gain for the really expensive cases simply aren't worth the cost. If you find a case you like, look around for better prices; sometimes you can find really good cases much cheaper at one retailer compared to another. If you like one which is more than $100 look very carefully at the stats, ask yourself if you really need the features it offers compared to a less expensive case.
General case comments:
Drive bays - Each case has a different number of bays. Consider your needs. You likely won't change your needs drastically, so there isn't much point in getting something that would be overkill.
Cooling - Case fans can make a decent amount of difference in the overall temperatures inside your case. Choosing a case with more than one fan, particularly if they can be changed to different speeds, is a good idea. Two should be plenty.
Noise - Few cases are louder than others simply based on design. The exception to this are ones which have open sides or fronts, as the open nature will allow for a little more noise to come out. Basically your noise level will be impacted more by the number and type of fans the case has than by design.
C00ln3ss! - The "coolness" factor of a case can deceptive. Be sure the case meets your needs on the above factors before buying it just becaue it looks cool. Some of those cool design factors may impact the ease of installation of parts or how well the case cools the parts inside.
Size - Some cases (especially the smaller ones) can be difficult to work with (when installing stuff). This can be problematic if you expect to change out parts. While the larger cases can often provide plenty of internal room, they can take up a lot of external room - meaning that large case which is very roomy inside may take up all of the available space you have in your PC area. Balance the case size with your biological size needs - meaning leave enough room for your PC parts as well as enough room for your body parts. Consider where that PC will go in relation to where you will go. Will the size be helpful or harmful to your personal space?
Weight - A minor point, but one to consider none the less. Aluminum cases will be lighter compared to Steel cases. If you are going to be changing parts every now and then, or carrying your PC to a friends for those lan party weekends, you may want to consider a smaller aluminum case.
Lifespan: About 5 years. When you need to change will be determined by changes in the industry which alter Motherboard or graphic card size.
Recommendations: Choose a case that fits your computing needs as well as your personal needs. I'd avoid ones that include 'no name' power supplies, as the power supply is really the heart of your system. (See the power supply section above for details.)
Cooler Master Centurion 5 - This is a decent looking and very low-cost case. It should do just fine for basic needs. However, be aware it may not have the room required by some of the larger graphic cards, such as the new Nvidia 8800 GTX.
NZXT Hush - This is a roomy looking case that has sound dampening material. This should be a good one for those seeking lots of room with a quiet case.
Antec Three Hundred (NewEgg link) / (ProVantage link) - This is a great low cost case with some higher-end features. It comes with two fans, one on top and one in the back, with optional locations to mount fans on the front of the case and the side. Typical of Antec, these are tri-cool fans, so you have three different settings you can choose. I believe it would have enough room to fit the larger 10.5" graphic cards. Additionally it has washable filters.
Antec Nine Hundred (NewEgg link) / (ProVantage link) - This is a very uber looking case with three 120mm fans (with a 4th optional) and one 200mm top fan which should keep any system plenty cool. With three different speeds on each fan, you have the option to keep the system quiet or to go for maximum cooling. Additionally, it has enough room to accommodate the larger 10.5" graphic cards. (I recommend removing the fan from the back of the hard drive cage to have a bit more wiggle room if you have a 10.5" graphics card. You will have plenty of cooling without it.).
Antec Nine Hundred Two (NewEgg link) / (ProVantage link) - This is an improvement over the 900 in terms of minor design astehtics as well as the addition of liquid ports, washable air filters, a fan speed control, and cable organization on the back of the motherboard tray. Note that the price difference between this and the original 900 may be fairly high while this case is still "a new item". This would be the ultimate in cooling for those who have a lot of devices. Additionally, it has enough room to accommodate the larger 10.5" graphic cards.
If you'd like to add more case fans, or replace the ones which come with your case, I recommend using Antec tri-cool fans. These have an adjustable speed (three settings), so you can tailor the speed according to your need or your preference for fan volume.
Antec 120mm Tri-Cool - Red led, Green led, Blue led, No led
If more fans doesn't push airflow where you need it to go Antec has a fan that allows you to target specific spots - the SpotCool. NewEgg link and Amazon link. The SpotCool also has three speed settings, just like the tri-cool fans.
|
Peripherals The peripherals are what I'd consider the parts that create an interface between the user and the system. These parts are unlikely to have an impact in terms of hardware performance, but may alter how the user interacts with the system based on their ease of use to their owner.
|
|
Mouse
|
Let me begin by saying that the G9 is one of the best mice I have ever owned. This seems to be a trend, in that each Logitech mouse upgrade I make improves my experience. The mouse begins very light, but has extra weights so you can tailor its weight to your style. It is fairly small, though very similar in size compared to the G5. I would guess it to be about 85% of the length. It is, however, a lower profile mouse. My fingers rest in a more natural position on the G9. The scroll wheel is a pretty superior design overall and feels like solid construction compared to the fumbly G5 design. It rolls quickly and smoothly. The on-the-fly setting switch is different from the G5 design, in that the G9 is flat and sort of 'one' with the overall design. This might make it a bit more challenging to change mid-combat. I'm sure it wouldn't take very long before you could get used to it. The side button seems great, but the front/side button seems a bit more difficult to get to. I find myself moving my entire thumb area on my hand to get to it. While this may seem troublesome now, I'm sure I can get quicker at it in the future, and it certainly is a lot faster than doing something like, say for example, moving my left hand off of 'wasd' to hit an F key.
It would appear that Logitech has stopped including drivers with the mouse. This is a bit of a double edged sword in that it's good because it ensures that the user has the most recent version of the software, as they are forced to download them, but bad in that people actually have to go online to get them. However, I don't know if this is really an issue, as the mouse is plug and play compatible and works just fine after windows has detected it.
A new feature for the G9 is a customizable faceplate housing. The G9 comes with 2, one being targeted at a gamer design, and one a more classic style design. I am honestly shocked that we haven't seen specific game-specific designs. I know there have been some special G5s out there with Battlefield images and it surprised me to not see any designs for the G9. Hopefully we will see some nice plates for low cost in the future allowing you to swap your design when it strikes your fancy. Another new feature for the G9 is the ability to change the LED colors. This can be done fairly easily through the SetPoint sofware.
Lifespan: About 3 years or as needed.
Recommendations, Wired:
Razer Diamondback 3G (blue) - 1800 dpi max, glowy bits that look cool (you can turn them off), 7 buttons, 5 profile settings.
Razer Banshee blue - 9 button, 4000 dpi max, glowy bits that look cool (you can turn them off), 5 profile settings.
Logitech G5 - 7 button, 2000 dpi max, adjustable weights at the bottom, 3 profile settings. One of the best choices for gamers.
Logitech G9 (current model) - 7 button, 3200 dpi max, adjustable weights at the bottom, 5 profile settings, custom LED coloring, and interchangeable faceplates. An excellent choice for gamers.
Logitech G9x (new model, temp link) - 7 button, 5000 dpi max, adjustable weights at the bottom, 5 profile settings, custom LED coloring, and interchangeable faceplates. An excellent choice for gamers. This is a revision to the original G9, offering higher resolution and slightly different face plates.
Recommendations, Cordless:
Logitech G7 - 6 button, 2000 dpi max, 3 profile settings, two batteries. While the 2000 dpi rating sounds a bit low compared to wired gaming mice, it should be plenty to game at on even larger monitors. I am currently on a 1920x1200 screen and I use a setting of 1600 dpi. I find higher is just a touch too fast for my tastes. Since there are two batteries you can easily swap it out when it gets low. I had a G7 for a while and it took me about 5 seconds to swap the battery if I did it quickly.
Mouse pad:
I don't know how critical exact mousing is to everyone else, but I like my movements to be precise. Fumbling and hitches were left behind long ago when I stopped using non-gaming mice. While I would not recommend an expensive mouse pad to all, for those who don't want their mouse movements disrupted, I'd say get yourself a good one. This one has been used and endorsed by professional gaming teams.
Recommendations:
Razer eXactMat - 13" x 10.43" - Anodized Aluminum side and 'speed side' surface types.
Razer Destructor - 13.78" x 11" - Plastic surface type.
SteelSeries 5C WoW limited edition - 15" x 11" - Rigid plastic covered in foam and cloth surface type.
|
| Keyboard

|
My keyboard is the first generation of the Eclipse line and has a backlight only, while the newer ones have light that also shines through the key lettering. This is a great keyboard (as far as feeling, pressure, size) and the added light allows you to mentally keep track of key location when gaming in the dark (which us gamers tend to do probably far more than is healthy for us). The only disadvantage to a lighted keyboard it is lighted. This means that every little piece of dust or crumb that falls past those keys is going to be lit up if you use the light. For those times you don't want the lights, you can set it to be unlit and it looks like any other non-lit keyboard.
Lifespan: About 5 years. Change as needed.
Recommendations:
Razer Lycosa Gaming Keyboard - A keyboard that has programmable profiles for quick programmable key changes.
Logitech G11 Gaming Keyboard - All of the features of the G15 minus the LED screen.
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard - This was one of the first gamer keyboards to launch on the market. It features programmable keys as well as a small LCD that can display various things. To my knowledge very few apps actually use the small LCD so I don't know how much of a selling point this has, nor how useful it would be. This link is to the new version of the keyboard. You may be able to find the older version for a bit cheaper.
Logitech G19 Gaming Keyboard (due March) - While not yet officially launched, this is an update to the G15 keyboard featuring a full color LCD and more macro keys. I'll bet the price will rapidly drop to $150 post release, possibly less, as $200 is just too high of an amount even for the most uber of keyboards.
|
| Game Controller

|
I think if I were ever to get a controller for PC gaming again I'd likely go with the Logitech ChillStream controller. I don't need the cooling effect myself, I rarely sweat, but Microsoft has been focusing on connectivity between Vista PC players and Xbox 360 players. This Xbox 360 style could come in handy with games that are available both on Windows and the Xbox 360 as they may use the same button setup.
Recommendations:
Xbox 360 Wireless Controller, White or Black - A standard Xbox 360 controller.
Xbox 360 Wireless Receiver for Windows - You will need this so your wireless controller (above) can talk to the PC.
Logitech ChillStream - Looks good. Xbox 360 style. Fan and vents to keep your hand cool / sweat free.
Logitech Cordless RumblePad 2 - A solid gamepad. Playstation 'dual shock' style. Cordless.
|
|
Monitor
|
The 16:10 and 16:9 aspect LCDs are really great. Games look really good when they use the wide screen resolution (which basically almost all of the new ones do). Some monitors have extra inputs, allowing you to watch a picture in picture image. Note that currently 16:10 aspect is native to PCs, while 16:9 is a standard used with HDTV and video. I'm sure that throughout 2009, and even more so from 2010 and beyond, we will begin to see 16:10 aspect phasing out and 16:9 becoming the standard for both. There are already rumors (April '09) that 16:10 is being dropped by laptop screen manufacturers.
Note that as you increase your screen resolution you will need a more powerful graphics card to keep pace with the higher resolution. See my star rating system in the graphic card section to decide what cards would be best for which resolutions.
Another aspect of LCD tech that makes me very happy is that a circle is a circle and a square is a square no matter where it is on the screen. Standard CRTs suffer from 'geometry issues' where, as you move objects around on the screen, depending on their position they may slightly change shape. This is a non-issue with LCDs as the screen is drawn in a grid and is always exact.
The only major disadvantage to the LCD tech is that currently they do not have 'glass screens'. This means that you have to be extremely careful to not get anything on it, point at it with fingers, pens, or other poking devices, squish bugs on it, bump into it, etc. It cannot be cleaned with normal cleaning methods (you have to use a soft cloth and plain water and press pretty carefully, which is best done in vertical and/or horizontal movements or use a special cleaning kit). I think the reason they don't currently have glass covers is that the screen changes color depending on temperature and we don't currently have the technology to place hard glass over the LCD mesh without affecting the temperature.
Lifespan: About 4 years.
1680x1050 res, 16:10 aspect, Recommendations:
Acer X223Wbd - 22" DVI, VGA.
Samsung T220 - 22" DVI, VGA.
1680x1050 res, 16:10 aspect, Nvidia GeForce 3D Vision compatible Recommendations:
Samsung Syncmaster 2233RZ (only sold with glasses) - 22" A good size with good res. No extra inputs.
1920x1080 res, 16:9 aspect, Recommendations:
Acer X233Hbid - 23" HDMI, DVI, VGA.
Samsung 2333SW - 23" DVI, VGA.
1920x1200 res, 16:10 aspect, Recommendations:
Samsung TOC T240HD - 24" HDMI, DVI, VGA.
Dell 2408WFP - 24" HDMI, DVI, Display port, VGA, Composite, Component. This monitor claims a 110% Color Gamut, meaning it will display more colors than an old school CRT. This would be an awesome choice for graphic designers and gamers alike. It also supports HDMI and HDCP meaning it's completely ready for Blu-ray watching.
Samsung T260 - 25.5" HDMI, DVI, VGA, Optical S/PDIF.
Samsung 2693HM - 26" HDMI, DVI, VGA.While similar to the above T260 this screen has better contrast/ratio than other monitors.
Dell 2709W - 27" HDMI, DVI, Display port, VGA, Composite, Component. This may very well be the best monitor. It claims a 110% Color Gamut, meaning it will display more colors than an old school CRT. This would be an awesome choice for graphic designers and gamers alike. It also supports HDMI and HDCP meaning it's completely ready for Blu-ray watching. 2560x1600 res, 16:10 aspect, Recommendations:
Dell 3008WFP - 30" HDMI, DVI, Display port, VGA, Composite, Component. It claims a 117% Color Gamut, meaning it will display more colors than an old school CRT. This would be an awesome choice for graphic designers and gamers alike. You will want to use dual GPUs or have a very high end GPU to run this. I only recommend this for someone who can afford the very best GPU all the time. (For some reason this is often out of stock.)
Samsung Syncmaster 305T - 30" DVI. You will want to use dual GPUs or have a very high end GPU to run this. I only recommend this for someone who can afford the very best GPU all the time. This is a fair bit lower cost than the Dell, as it only features a DVI input, while the Dell has many additional input options. This also seems to lack an HDCP certification, so you may run into trouble running Blu-ray (or HD-DVD) media on this monitor.
Projections:
Be aware that currently the industry is moving to HDMI. However, HDMI is only important for high-def DVD viewing. If that is not important to you, don't worry about it, as the industry will slowly transfer to HDMI over time and by the time you replace the items over the next few years you'd get HDMI anyways. Another new standard appearing for monitors is Display Port. I don't know which standard will be more readily adopted, but most graphic cards include adaptors, so you are free to use the older DVI standard, HDMI or Display Port.
|
|
Glasses
|
Nvidia has launched a set of glasses which allow you to game in 3d. How cool is that? Unfortunately, this technology has some tricky requirements right now.
First, you'll need the glasses kit itself, which at the time of this writing is $200. There has been mention you can get additional glasses for friends to watch with you, but I haven't seen any pricing on additional glasses. Hopefully this means that the glasses and hub will come down in price fairly quickly.
Second, you'll need a special PC monitor with a 120 Hz refresh rate. This is problematic at this time as nearly all PC LCDs are 60 Hz, only two are referenced as being compatible. Those who are considering using a 120 Hz HDTV will need to have a DLP certification, which again there only seem to be a few of. Old school CRTs may have a better chance of immediate adoption, as they only need to run at 100 Hz or faster, which many do.
Third, you'll need a pretty powerful Nvidia graphics card. The technology works by creating two images, so your frame rate is effectively cut in half as each eye needs to see half the images. I'd recommend only those with a GTX 2xx series and up consider it, be that by the next series or by combining previous generation cards in SLI.
Lastly, you'll need Microsoft Vista (or newer.)
Within a year I'm sure there will be far more monitors out that are compatible and the drivers and compatibility will be greatly improved. I will certainly update my site as they do. But for now, it seems like there are some trade offs. As with any bleeding edge product some games work very well with the technology and some don't. You might even want to consider getting a compatible monitor and pairing that with a (standard) higher resolution monitor for those times the trade offs just don't seem worth the 3D gain. But for early adopters who can afford the GPU power and possibly having multiple screens, it looks like great fun.
Lifespan: Until technology changes.
Glasses and Monitor:
Nvidia GeForce 3D Vision glasses and monitor - The first 3d glasses kit with montior. (Links will be added as more options pan out.)
Projections:
This is a brand new technology only just now launched in early 2009. While the technology can only get better be aware that it likely could remain bleeding edge for a while (possibly years). For early adopters this really is a no-brainer as costs are somewhat low for such a cool gain. (Low in a bleeding edge sense.) For those in the mainstream, however, it could be a while before monitors and glasses filter down to lower cost ranges which make it worthy of considering making that extra leap.
|
|
Operating System
|
There is often little choice in which operating system you use. While non-Microsoft operating systems will work for many non-gaming applications, they really won't work for gamers.
If you need a new operating system, I recommend going with Vista. If you already have an operating system, you might want to stick with XP unless you have a DirectX10 compatible graphics card and want to play games through DX10. Note that some games perform very well under DirectX10, while others perform very poorly compared to running under DirectX9. Thankfully, these games often provide an option to run without the DirectX10 code if you find you can't get playable framerates.
Caution I have heard that Vista doesn't always play well with music download programs. If you are a big music buff who uses an iPod or Rhapsody you might want to do some research and see which versions of Vista are, or are not, compatible.
Recommendations:
Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit w/SP1 - OEM version - This is the OEM version that most people will want to purchase. Note that an OEM version does not include the 90 days of free tech support that the other versions include. If you are good at troubleshooting (such as how to update drivers) this may not be important.
Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit w/SP1 - OEM version - The Ultimate version has a few extra things that you may or may not need. Primarily these are business or media utilities. Note: This version has the same limitations as above.
Windows Vista Home Premium w/SP1 - Retail version - This should be the retail version gamers would want. This is a 32-bit version of Vista. You have to upgrade to the 64-bit version. (You can order a disk online which is free, but costs $10 in shipping.)
Windows Vista Ultimate w/SP1 - Retail version - This is the retail version for the person who wants everything. This includes disks for 64-bit and 32-bit.
Windows 7 Release Candidate - This is the release candidate version of Windows 7, meaning just about what you'd get with an actual release product. Note that this is free, but it will expire, meaning you'd have to reinstall the actual released version of Windows 7 once it's out. However, this is FREE, so if you are doing a new build you may want to consider using this if you don't have an OS you could otherwise use. I'd recommend downloading it and burning it on DVD prior to your build so you have it on disk if you chose to do this. I've seen reference that Windows 7 is expected to launch in late October.
If you would like to see a comparison chart of the different Vista versions and what they include, you can look at one here.
I have no clue why they don't just sell the 64-bit version directly. It is really dumb that they don't. Seems like it is reserved for only the more expensive versions. You can order a 64-bit disk online for $10 by visiting a website if you already have the retail 32-bit version.
Projections: Be aware that there are rumors that Windows 7 will be launching in Summer 2009.
|
|
3dMark06 / 3dMark05 / Vantage
|
While testing your system is not critical I will always install the most recent versions of Futuremark's 3dMark software to test my system after I've set it up. I also like to run these tests after I've changed a major part, such as when I upgrade my graphics card, or even if I have changed DirectX versions or updated my GPU drivers. It is a great way to see if everything is working and if you go online to compare to other people's scores it is also a great way to see if you seem to be near the range of other systems with your parts and operating system.
You can find links to download the software here.
|
|
|
Digital cleaning:
Your PC constantly builds up little 'bits' of left over information in the system directory, as well as suffers from attack from web pests (adware, spyware, viruses, etc.) In order to keep your system running quickly and smoothly I recommend getting these two programs. I run a Registry sweep about once a month and let Spysweeper run once a week. And to keep things speedy defrag my hard drive once a month as well.
Registry Mechanic specializes in finding the 'left over' bits of information that accumulates in your system as time goes on. It is easy to use and fairly cheap should you choose to purchase it. Keeping the system registry clean will help speed up the overall operation of your system.
ESET NOD32 Antivirus will find almost all of the known viruses. According to many reviewers it does as good of a job, and sometimes a better job, than Norton. The ESET software also reportedly uses fewer resources and works more invisibly on your system.
AVG Free Antivirus will find almost all of the known viruses and you can get it for teh free. It is a touch more limited than the pay antivirus software solutions in that it doesn't have some of the same features (which at the time of this writing is a firewall or message protection), but the pay versions also don't always offer those either.
Webroot Spysweeper will find almost any ad or spyware on your PC and delete it. Adware and Spyware are things that evil companies use to track what you are doing with your PC. Some of these are both illegal and dangerous. These little programs will slowly eat up your system resources as they store and gather more and more data. I highly recommend people protect themselves with Spysweeper.
Disk Cleanup is a free thing with Windows. You can find it by going to the start menu, accessories, system tools, then "Disk Cleanup". You don't need to do this one very often, but your system does store temporary files that you don't need after a while and this will clean those up. I'd say try and do this maybe every 4 to 6 months.
In some versions of Windows the Disk Defrag can be found in the same area as the Disk Cleanup tool. In others it will be in your control panel under Performance and Maintenance. The hard drive works like a book, and when data is in the proper order it will run quickly. If, however, the 'pages' get all jumbled up looking things up will take a lot longer and performance will be affected. I recommend running a disk defrag once a month or every other month. Note: It is critical that you not defrag your hard drive if it is a solid state drive. Solid state drives do not need to be defragged and doing so may actually reduce their lifespan.
Physical cleaning:
You can get cans of "compressed air" in many different forms. These are typically sold at computer stores, but you can also sometimes find them at other stores, such as gaming stores like GameStop or EB Games. The most common is the "Dust-off" brand. You can often find these sold singly, as a double plack, or in 3 packs. Often a 3 pack is the best deal for the money. I recommend opening up your system and blowing the parts off to get all the dust out once every 6 months, although once every 4 months is probably ideal. Also, you have to be very careful when cleaning an LCD monitor, and the best way to do this is with compressed air, or if you need to get yuck off, use cleaning wipes.
|
| Power

|
Your system is always at risk of damage from any kind of anomaly on the power line. As such I always recommend people protect their system with a good surge protector or universal power supply (also known as a battery backup). Don't go cheap with these. A good surge protector will stabilize the flow of electricity as well as decrease 'line noise' and help stabilize any over or under current situations. Also, many of them will cut power once power is lost, preventing your system from flickering on and off during a situation when power becomes unstable.
A good surge protector will probably run you between $25-35 and is a very worthwhile investment for any system.
Uninteruptable Power Supplies (UPS) tend to be a lot more expensive and range in price from about $75 to $750. Here is the tricky part - you want a battery backup that will be able to cover your current power needs. This is something you don't have to consider if you are using a simple surge protector. I would say that you probably want to target one which has a "VA rating" equal to, or higher than, your power supply rating. The average gamer doesn't need a battery backup, however, if you would like an extra few minutes to shut the system down after you loose power you may want to consider one. I'd say you probably only want to consider one if you work with media, such as video or audio editing. An gamer doesn't need to spend the money on a UPS.
Recommendations:
APC SurgeArrest P8T3 - 1750 joules - This should be all you really need unless your area is prone to surges on data lines (such as an area that gets lightning strikes).
APC SurgeArrest P11VT3 - 2030 joules - A bit more protection than the base model and a couple more plugs.
|
|